Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
ThePyg
| Reward Points: | 6738 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 87% |
| Arguments: | 6129 |
| Debates: | 114 |
so what you're saying is the killing of others is violent if you can somehow justify it...
that's a weird definition of violence.
According to the dictionary definition of violence:
: exertion of physical force so as to injure or abuse (as in warfare effecting illegal entry into a house) b : an instance of violent treatment or procedure
2 : injury by or as if by distortion, infringement, or profanation : outrage
3 a : intense, turbulent, or furious and often destructive action or force b : vehement feeling or expression : fervor; also : an instance of such action or feeling c : a clashing or jarring quality : discordance
4 : undue alteration (as of wording or sense in editing a text)
killing Nazis would be considered violent, no matter what (unless we use your non-dictionary definition, of course).
Well, let's say there's this guy (for the sake of this story, his name will be Hidler). And he hates a race of people (The Joos) and he decides to kill them all in a holocaust (about six million).
We stop him with violence (War is pretty violent, right?). I would say saving all the Joos from Hidler through violent means is justified.
|
||||||||||||||||
