Return to CreateDebate.comJoin this debate community

freepressbible.net



Welcome to freepressbible.net!

freepressbible.net is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Identify Ally
Declare Enemy
Challenge to a Debate
Report This User

Allies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Enemies
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


Hostiles
View All
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic
pic


RSS Kinda

Reward Points:1649
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
84%
Arguments:1962
Debates:69
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
4 most recent arguments.
1 point

Violence is like anything else in the world.

There's good things about it, there's bad things about it.

Too little of it and too much of it - both do harm.

So what am I saying?

Violence is a necessity.

1 point

Cool :)

Violence is justified all the time....unfortunately

Violence is the last and most effective means to get a point across

You really believe that?

I feel violence should always be the last action to take - because it has the most obvious destructive effects. However it should never be disregarded completely. It should always be the last move taking into consideration the situation...

1 point

I'm finding it difficult to understand what you're saying but I'll try.

I don't see how violence is a violation of an agreement. Sometimes violence IS an agreement. Let's say for example I lent somebody money. I made it clear that I will use violence if that money was not paid back. It was not paid back. I used violence. That is an example of how violence is in no form a violation of an agreement. Infact lack of violence would be.

Violence is the last and most effective means to get a point across (generally although there are many circumstances where it is not).

If I have completely missed the point I apologise and ask you to explain to me as simply as possible what you're trying to get. Thanks

1 point

Well if it's the definition of violence we have to debate for -

Violence is any form of physical attack. If I punch my friend in the arm it is violence - but such little amount of violence. If I have a fight with someone at school it is a much larger and obvious amount of violence.

Violence tends to have negative connotations.

Is smacking your kid violence? If yes - then I will always agree that violence can be justified. If hitting someome to protect your pride and honour is violence again I would say it is justified. We should always look for non-violence, but there are times when violence is justified.

Meat industry violent?

Kinda has not yet created any debates.

About Me


Biographical Information
Gender: Male
Marital Status: Single
Political Party: Other
Country: United Kingdom
Religion: Hindu

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here